2010 (7) TMI 117

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ent for the Respondent: ShriU. Raja Ram, JDR CORAM: Hon'ble Shri M. V. Ravindran, Member (Judicial) and Hon'ble Shri P. Karthikeyan, Member (Technical) PER: M. V. RAVINDRAN   The appellant has filed this Miscellaneous application bearing No. ST/Misc./23/2010 for considering additional grounds of the appeal which were not taken in their appeal memorandum. After hearing both sides, we f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....upheld the contentions raised by the appellant and has rejected the contentions partly. He submits that the impugned order of the Commissioner (Appeals) to the extent which is rejected the refund claim filed by the appellant is being challenged and to the extent which is allowed their appeal, it is the submission that the Revenue has not filed any appeal. 3. Ld. JDR submits that the issue invol....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....005 to 30 April 2006. The Commissioner (Appeals) has rejected the appeal on the grounds that the appellant has not followed the provisions of Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Ld. Counsel submits that the appellant is eligible for availing Cenvat Credit as per the provisions of paragraph 6.11 of the Foreign Trade Policy and the Hand book of procedures. It is the submission that with effect from....