2010 (1) TMI 316
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... Bindal, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri SR. Meena, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per: D.N. Panda, Member (J)]. - There is a Service tax demand of Rs. 7,32,7941- for the services of Cargo Handling Services provided by the appellant. Learned Counsel for Appellant submits that the appellant was ignorant of the provisions of the law for which he could not pay Service tax. That was reasonab....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ara 4.3 of the order. Ld. Appellate Authority has also addressed the issue of limitation in para 4.4 of the impugned order. Fairly, he held that there shall be liability of Service tax to the aforesaid extent with the consequential penalty and interest. 4. There is no material today before us to appreciate that the appellant should get any benefit of ignorance and the law of limitation shall co....
TaxTMI