2009 (9) TMI 535

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Malhotra, for the Appellant. S/Shri Mukesh Anand with Mr. Shailesh Tiwari, for the Respondent. [Order]. - Rule D.B. With the consent of the parties, we have taken up the matter for final disposal at this stage itself. 2. The petitioners herein received show-cause notice dated 31-10-2007 covering the period from June 2005 to March 2007 whereby the respondent demanded service tax, inclusiv....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....th respect to the second show-cause notice. 3. The petitioner No. 1 has preferred two separate appeals against the aforesaid common order dated 2-3-2009 before the CESTAT. Along with these appeals, the petitioners also moved stay application for grant of stay and waiver of pre-deposit of service tax, cess and penalty in both the appeals. In these stay applications, common order dated 17-7-2009 ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... submission of the petitioners, as is clear from the impugned order itself and in view of the observation "A cursory look to scope of work order does not rule out involvement of goods in the contract". However, according to the Tribunal, it can only be examined during the course of final hearing of the appeals as to whether plea of the appellants that under VAT law 80% of the value shall be attrib....