2010 (2) TMI 280
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....i S.P. Kesarwani, Sr. Standing Counsel, for the Respondent. [Order]. - This is an appeal against the order of Tribunal dated 17th February, 2009 by which the Tribunal has allowed the application for waiver of predeposit of the Service tax in part and directed the appellant to deposit a sum of Rs. 6 lacs. 2. Appellant has been treated as tour operator and accordingly has been held liable to s....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....peal, the appellant filed an appeal before the tribunal. The tribunal has disposed of the appeal and directed the appellant to deposit a sum of Rs. 6 lacs and directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to decide the appeal on merits on deposit of Rs. 6 lacs. In pursuance thereof the appellant deposited a sum of Rs. 6 lacs and thereafter the Commissioner (Appeals) decided the appeal on merit. The Commissi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....osit a further sum of Rs. 6 lacs, apart from Its. 6 lacs which has already been deposited. 7. Learned Standing Counsel supported the order of the Tribunal. 8. Having heard counsel for the parties, we have gone through the impugned order of the Tribunal. The Tribunal in the impugned order has observed that the interpretation of the notification is doubtful and the appellant may or may not get....
TaxTMI