2009 (9) TMI 520

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Appellant. None, for the Respondent. [Order per: M. Veeraiyan, Member (T) (Oral)]. - This is an appeal by the Department against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) dated 12-7-2004. 2. None appears for the respondents in spite of notice. Heard the learned DR. 3. The respondents were supplying LPG Cylinder to Government owned oil companies namely, HPCL, IOCL and BPCL and the pur....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ards the claim for the period from 1-1-2001 to 31-3-2001, taking note of the fact that subsequently the assessment has been finalized on 29-3-2004, he allowed the refund claim for the said period. 5. Learned DR submits that the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) in allowing the refund prior to 17-4-1998 is incorrect. The Price Variation Clauses in the purchase orders placed by the buyers with ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ment was filed only on 17-4-1998, the question of treating assessment during the period from 1-4-1997 to 16-4-1998 as provisional assessment does not arise. The procedure prescribed for the purpose of provisional assessment in terms of Rule 9B has not been complied with for this period. Therefore, the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) in allowing the refund for this period is erroneous. In view ....