Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2008 (12) TMI 355

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ax Act, 1961 (for short, "the Act") against the order dated December 28, 2007, passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench "H", New Delhi in I. T. A. No.1165/DEL/2007 for the assessment year 2000-01, proposing to raise the following substantial questions of law : "1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the hon'ble Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was right in la....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t is correct, when the Assessing Officer had recorded initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) in the assessment order? 3. Whether the hon'ble Income-tax Appellate Tribunal in deciding that proving contumacious intent is an essential ingredient in levy of penalty in contravention of the provisions of a civil statute like Income-tax Act in spite of there being so many judgments ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... deleted the penalty on the ground that merely for raising a debatable issue, penalty could not be imposed, in the absence of any concealment or misrepresentation by the assessee. The said finding has been affirmed by the Tribunal in the following terms: " . . . The assessee during penalty proceedings claimed that there is no concealment and the addition/disallowances has been made on account o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....es v. Deputy CIT [2001] 251 ITR 401 (Bom) was in favour of the assessee. It was also pleaded that in the own case of the assessee for the assessment year 1998-99, the impugned addition was deleted by the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) vide order dated September 12, 2006. In the present appeal also the claim of the assessee was duly supported by certificate of chartered accountant. It....