TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2009 (8) TMI 604
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nder Shah, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per: Justice R.M.S Khandeparkar, President (Oral)].- Since a common question of law and fact arise in all these appeals, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. 2. We have heard the Representative of the appellants and the learned DR for the respondent. We have also perused the memo of appeal and annexures there to. 3. T....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....this stage, it is necessary to record that the Tribunal was compelled to ask the Representative of the appellants to go and leave the Court Hall while dictating the order as there was repeated interruptions by him, in spite of warning against such interruptions. 6. Indeed , the records placed before the Tribunal disclose that similar issue arose in Quality Steel Products Pvt. Ltd. v. C.C.E. repor....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....decision in Quality Steel Products Pvt. Ltd., further the fact that the same was not interfered with by the Apex Court. Since the Apex Court did not interfere in the decision of Quality Steel Products Pvt. Ltd. it will be necessary for this Tribunal to apply same ruling in relation to the classification of the similar product. Considering the same, as right]y submitted on behalf of the appellants ....