Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2007 (12) TMI 274

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... T. A. No. 998 of 2007 is an appeal by the Revenue against the order dated February 9, 2001, passed by the Tribunal in I. T. A. No. 430(Del)/1998 for the assessment year 1995-96. Since both the appeals raise an identical question; they are being disposed of by this common judgment. 2. The question sought to be urged by the Revenue in both appeals is as follows: "Whether the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that the notional interest on refundable interest free deposit  received by the assessee in respect of a shop let out on rent was neither       taxable as business profit under section 28(iv) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) nor income from house property under section 23(1)(a) of&nbs....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nal. allowed the assessee's appeal and reversed the decision of the. Commissioner of Income-tax relying upon its order in the case of the assessee. itself for the assessment year 2000-01. 6. Ms. Prem Lata Bansal, learned senior standing counsel for the. Revenue refers to the relevant statutory provisions and submits that it is. inconceivable that the assessee received the interest free deposit in. respect of the premises let out on rent without any benefit accruing to it. The value of such benefit had been reasonably determined by the Assessing. Officer and, therefore, the subsequent order of the reversal of the Tribunal. was incorrect in law. According to her, the decision of the Tribunal in. Bharat Hotels Ltd. v. Deputy CIT [1995] 5....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed by any local authority in respect of the property shall be deducted (irrespective of the previous year in which the liability to pay such taxes was incurred by the owner according to the method of accounting regularly employed by him) in determining the annual value of the property of that previous year in which such taxes are actually paid by him. Explanation. - For the purposes of clause (b) or clause (c) of this sub-section, the amount of actual rent received or receivable by the owner shall not include, subject to such rules as may be made in this behalf, the amount of rent which the owner cannot realise. 28. Profits and gains of business or profession. - The following income shall be chargeable to income-tax under the head 'Pr....