2009 (9) TMI 383

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Appellant. Shri V.V. Hariharan, JCDR, for the Respondent. [Order per: Chittaranjan Satapathy, Member (T)]. - Heard both sides. 2. Shri K.S. Venkatagiri, ld. Advocate appearing for the appellants states that the appellants' factories are located in Pondicherry, Mumbai and Bhuvaneshwar jurisdiction wherein they manufacture dutiable plastic bottles for packing of 'Ujala', which is exempted. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lowed the deduction claimed in respect of cap and stopper holding that they are unable to produce evidence that the Mumbai production included the cost of the same and that the appellants have submitted only a Chartered Accountant's certificate. Moreover, we find from the submission made by the ld. Counsel that while there is a dispute regarding inclusion of cost of cap and stopper in the value of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....value under Rule 6(b)(i). 6. Rule 6(b)(i) provides for determination of the value ensuing value of the comparable goods produced or manufactured by the assessee or by any other assessee. As stated above, by definition, such value can be either determined under Section 4(i)(a) or under Section 4(i)(b), the latter being the value determined under the Valuation Rules. In the present case, there is....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....own unit. However, he states that while remanding the matter for re-computation of the duty on the above basis, the original authority may also be directed to examine the issue of limitation which has been raised before the Tribunal. 7. Accordingly we set aside the impugned order and remand the matter to the original authority for determining the value of the bottles produced in Pondicherry on ....