TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2009 (7) TMI 596
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Rule 21 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, subject to the following conditions, namely:- (i) The cenvat credit in respect of inputs contained in the finished goods destroyed in the fire is reversed/paid by the assessee. The Divisional Assistant Commissioner to quantify and communicate this amount to the assessee within 30 days. (ii) the duty involved on the salvaged goods sold, is paid; (iii) duty of Rs. 1,336/- in respect of the dyes and chemicals returned, as such, to the suppliers is also paid; and, (iv) interest on the above amounts is paid as per Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944. 33. The assessee is also required to reverse/pay the cenvat credit in respect of the packing materials and raw materials (inputs) d....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002. This show-cause notice contained, inter alia, a reference to the surveyor's report considered by the insurance company. The aforesaid demand of Rs.3,16,889/- on packing materials and other chemicals was worked out on the basis of the surveyor's report. However, the show-cause notice did not accept the plea of destruction of goods in fire. It assumed that the goods were removed clandestinely without payment of duty. 3. The assessee contested the show cause notice on numerous grounds. At the same time, they also pressed for remission of duty on the goods which were claimed to have been destroyed in fire. This claim was pursued under Rule 21 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The issue arising out of the show-ca....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....subsequently before the adjudicating authority. 5. The learned SDR has opposed the above arguments of the counsel and has also reiterated the grounds stated in the department's appeal. 6. After considering the submissions, I find that the impugned order was passed by the Commissioner pursuant to a remand order of this Tribunal wherein any issue on merits had not been considered. In other words, the issues arise for consideration on merits at this stage for the first time. The show cause notice was issued at a time when the assessee's remission application was pending. This Tribunal took note of this aspect and remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication of the show-cause notice after disposing of the remissi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....7 called for by the adjudicating authority, it is stated that this report is also based on the surveyor's report. The learned Commissioner has accepted the quantification made by the Assistant Commissioner in his report and accordingly duty of over Rs.8.17 lakhs has been allowed as remission to the assessee in respect of the finished goods in question. In the present appeal, the department has not come out with any alternative account, calculation or other data in support of the plea that the quantification done by the Commissioner is not correct. In this scenario, the Commissioner's order granting remission of duty of Rs.8,17,271/- on the finished goods has to be sustained and it is ordered accordingly. As regards the relevant condition at....