2009 (8) TMI 437

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y, Member (T) Shri K.S. Venkatagiri, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri V.V. Hariharan, JCDR, for the Respondent. [Order per: Chittaranjan Satapathy, Member (T)]. - Heard both sides. Shri K.S. Venkatagiri, ld. Advocate appearing for the appellants states that the Kolkata Corporate office of the appellants is the input service distributor and the total credit received by the appellant's company h....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....confirms that the adjudicating Commissioner has further distributed the amount allocated to the Chennai unit of the appellants and therefore he does not oppose the prayer of remand by the ld. Advocate of the appellants. 3. After hearing both sides, we note that the initial distribution of the total credit received has been done by the corporate office of the appellants. The appellants have claime....