2009 (9) TMI 335

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Rohit Pardeshi, for the Respondent. [Judgment per: FerdinoI. Rebello, J. (Oral)]. - The petitioner had imported Ethyl/Butyl Glycol as described in para 4 of the petition. On arrival of the said goods, the petitioner filed bills of entry. According to the petitioner, the said goods appear at sr. no. 243 of Appendix 3A of AM-90-93 Policy which sets out list of limited permissible items. The peti....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....classified under Tariff Heading 29.05. According to the petitioner, the respondents have accepted the typographical error and therefore have been granting duty concession under the notification to several importers under sr. no.8 of the said Notification no. 39/90 dated 20th March 1990 as amended by Notification no. 60/91 dated 25th July 1991. In spite of the same, the petitioner has been denied t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rch 1990 on the footing that the duty is leviable as prescribed at sr. no. 8 of the said notification. 4. Reply has been filed on behalf of the respondents by Mr. A.M. Sahay, Deputy Commissioner of Customs. According to the respondents, the petitioner was not entitled to the benefit of the notification as the notification does not cover the goods which have been classified under Tariff Heading ....