2009 (9) TMI 270
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e Appellant. B. Seshagiri Rao for the Respondent. ORDER M.V. Ravindran, Judicial Member - All these stay petitions and appeals are directed against OIA Nos. 6 to 10/2009(H-I)DCE, dated 27-2-2009. After hearing both sides for sometime on the stay petitions, we find that the issue being in narrow compass, we reject the stay petitions filed by the revenue for staying the operation of the impugn....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... non-imposition of penalties by the lower authorities. 5. Ld. DR would reiterate the grounds of appeal and submitted that once there is a violation and there is a denial of CENVAT credit, automatically the penalty is mandatory and is to be imposed. 6. Ld. Counsel would submit that the issue has arisen on the ground that the respondents were denied the CENVAT credit on the service tax paid on....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ax paid on the input services "rent-a-cab, air travel agency, outdoor catering services, servicing of motor vehicles services etc." We have already allowed the appeal filed by the respondent/assessee relying upon the decision of Larger Bench in ABB Ltd. v. CCE & ST [2009] 21 STT 77 (Bang. - CESTAT), wherein the interpretation of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 has been settled. In view of this, we do no....
TaxTMI