Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (7) TMI 490

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Order].- Being aggrieved with that part of the impugned order of Commissioner (Appeals) vide which he has set aside the penalty imposed upon the respondents in terms of Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, Revenue has filed the present appeal. I have heard learned DR Shri R.S. Srova, appearing for the Revenue. 2. For better appreciation I reproduce the para 7 of the impugned order passed by Com....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....djudicating authority recorded any such finding. Therefore, penalty under Section 78 is not imposable in this case. It is also observed that the penalty under Section 78 cannot exceed the duty amount; however in this case, against the service tax involvement of Rs.22,148 /-, a penalty of Rs.35,000/- has been imposed, which is beyond the limits permissible under the law" 3. As against the above ....