Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (12) TMI 102

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ct, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'B' Bench, Chennai, dated 17.07.2009 passed in ITA No.0013/Mds/2009. For appellant: Mr.K.Subramaniam JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by K.RAVIRAJA PANDIAN, J.) The revenue on appeal against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras ''B' Bench, Chennai, dated 17.07.2009 passed in ITA No.00....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ment, the Assessing Officer, on perusal of the records was of the view that credit of MAT was wrongly given in the same assessment year and therefore issued notice under Section 148 of the Act. The assessment was completed on 10.09.2007 under Section 143(3) by holding that the credits for MAT was wrongly given and on that score added a sum of Rs.81,84,000/-. (ii) The assessee carried the matter....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h of cases with identical set of facts has been disposed of by this Court in T.C.A.Nos.887 of 2004 etc. batch on 09.04.2009 in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Chemplast Sanmar Limited reported in 314 ITR 231, wherein the first question of law raised was "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Tribunal is right in law in holding that the carry forward M....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... counsel appearing for the revenue has not produced any materials or given compelling reasons to take a contrary view with that of the Delhi High Court.  In such circumstances, we answer the first question in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. 5. In respect of the 2nd question of law, the Division Bench has held that the intention of the legislature is to give tax credit to ta....