2009 (1) TMI 401

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dgment of the court was delivered by 1. DEEPAK VERMA J. - Heard Sri Aravind and Aravind Chauhan, for Sri M. V. Seshachala, learned counsel for the appellants, on the question of admission. 2. This appeal is at the instance of the Revenue under section 260A of the 2 Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), against the order dated September 19, 2007, passed by the Income-ta....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion that the substantial question of law as projected in this appeal, which reads thus: "(i) Whether the appellate authorities were correct in setting aside the levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act?" is not required to be answered by us presently. If ultimately the appeal preferred by the Revenue, pending in I. T. A. No. 1152 of 2006 is allowed, then and then only the question ....