2009 (9) TMI 113

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t. Shri Fateh Singh, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per: D.N. Panda, Member (J)]. - Learned Counsel Shri Shukla submits that this appellant is a after-sales service provider on behalf of the Eureka Forbes. There is a service tax demand of Rs. 29,163/- only against this appellant while there was claim of benefit of Notification No. 6/2005, dated 1-3-2005. Shri Shukla submits that the appella....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n provided business auxiliary service. The non-speaking order shall not bring the appellant to service tax net. In view of status of the appellant as a small tax payer providing after-sales service on behalf of the Eureka Forbes and nothing being spelt out as to the activity of business auxiliary service alleged to have been provided, the appeal itself may be disposed of waiving pre-deposit. 2.....