2009 (5) TMI 236
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....indran, Member (J) Shri Dev Raj, C.A., for the Appellant. Ms. Joy Kumari Chander, JCDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : T.K. Jayaraman, Member (T)]. - This appeal has been filed in respect of O-I-O No. 21/06. dated 18-4-06 passed by the Commissioner of Service Tax, Bangalore. 2. We heard both sides. 3. The brief facts of the case are as follows:- A global tender was floated by M....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ugned order the adjudicating authority has invoked longer period. 4. The appellants are highly aggrieved over the impugned order. The learned Consultant took us through the relevant papers and stated that in respect of certain items of work undertaken by them, there will not be any service tax liability as they would not come within the ambit of services of consulting engineers. He also made it....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d by the assessee and as they did not furnish any separate break-up, they are liable to pay an amount of Rs. 47,87,809/-towards Service Tax liability pertaining to Consulting Engineers Services provided by them, Section 67 of the Ad, 1994 does not allow any kind of abatement in respect of Consulting Engineer's Services rendered by the assessee. As the assessee suppressed the value of taxable servi....
TaxTMI