Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (5) TMI 222

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order]. - Being aggrieved with the order passed by Commissioner (Appeals) Revenue has filed the present appeal. I have heard Shri R.S. Srova, learned DR, appearing for the Revenue and Shri S. Suriyanarayanan, learned advocate, appearing for the respondents. 2. The respondent paid duties under Compounded Levy Scheme. The dispute in respect of gallery portion ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....not reflect any duty of excess and only job charges were being collected by the assessee. The duty paid on account of gallery portion is only a fraction of the quantum of the whole of duty payable under the Compounded Levy Scheme and the other manufacturers similarly situate have been paid refund of excess duty collected on account of gallery portion. 4. He has further observed that inasmuch as....