1988 (1) TMI 229

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dent. [Order per : P.C. Jain, Member(T)].  - Brief facts of the case are that the respondent company availed of the benefit of the Notification No. 117/66 dated 16-7-1966 in respect of patent or proprietary medicines (P or P medicines) sold by the respondent company to the E.S.I.C. - a Govt. department - on the prices in terms of the contract entered into by the respondent company with ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....therefore, such medicines cannot be extended the benefit of the said notification. This point having been decided by the original authority at the first instance against the respondent company herein was decided in their favour by the lower appellate in its order-in-appeal dated 27-10-1978. That authority, however remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for checking on the two facts, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... demands against the respondent company was the same that the goods were not cleared to the E.S.I.C. authorities but to the approved retail chemist shops. The lower appellate authority by the impugned order has again confirmed the earlier orders of the predecessor authority and he has fully agreed with the decisions of its predecessor authority. The appellant-Collector has filed the appeal agai....