1987 (7) TMI 438

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Sachar, JDR, for the Respondents. [Order per: V.T. Raghavachari, Member (J)]. - The appellants M/s. Ideal Sheet Metal Stampings and Pressings (P) Ltd. filed a refund claim on the ground that duty had been paid under T.I. 68 CET but that the product (Ball Bearing Bobbin Holders) was properly classifiable under Tariff item 15A(2) CET. This refund claim was rejected by the Assistant Collector ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ad filed their classification list for approval under T.I. 68 and, on such approval, had been paying duty under the said item. Shri Sachar submitted that in the absence of any appeal against the said order on the classification list the refund claim was not maintainable. In view of the view that we are taking on the other merits in the appeal we do not think that it is necessary to go into this is....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ith some metallic contents. The Central Board of Excise & Customs tariff advice No. 47/82 clarified that plastic Ball Pens would be classifiable under item 15A(2) though it consisted of certain metal components also. 4. But Shri Sachar drew our attention to the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Geep Flash Light Industries Ltd. (1985 Vol. 22 E.L.T. 3). The Supreme Court had obser....