TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
1987 (5) TMI 272
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....960. They approached the Bombay High Court questioning the validity of the said notice and then following the order of the High Court dated 13 July 82, further proceedings were held in adjudication resulting in the order dated 4-9-1964 of the Assistant Collector whereunder he confirmed the demand. This order was set aside on appeal by the Collector of Central Excise, Pune under his order datded 21-8-1971. The Collector directed that without prejudice to re-adjudication on the merits of the case the order of the Assistant Collector was set aside. Subsequently another notice dated 4/5-5-1979 was issued. After further steps following the same the Assistant Collector passed orders on 15-11-1979 confirming the demand again. This order was upheld....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d raised. In setting aside this order the Collector upheld the contention for the appellants that there had been no proper investigation in the absence of statements having been recorded from partners of Ram Kumar and Co. and that there had been further violations also of principles of natural justice. This order was passed on 21-8-1971. 4.  But no further steps following the same appears to have been taken till the Deptt. issued another show cause notice on 5-5-1979. Shri Sethana comments that this very delay should invalidate the further proceedings in adjudication. We shall take up this contention later, if necessary. To continue the narrative, the Assistant Collector held further adjudication and passed his order on 21-11-1979. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....one of the grounds on which the Collector set aside the earlier order of the Assistant Collector. 5. The result was that in the subsequent adjudication also, following the issue of the second show cause notice, there was no participation in the proceedings by the partners of M/s. Ram Kumar & Co. and though the account books of the said Company appear to have been seized and relied upon to make out a case against the appellants there had been no opportunity given to the appellants to establish their case by taking steps for discrediting the said account books if needed. In his subsequent order dated 21-11-1979 also the Assistant Collector held that the two firms (the appellants and Ram Kumar & Co.) were part of a family concern and h....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....bout weaving charges alone being payable to the various weavers was not correct since such weaving charges would in the normal course be more or less uniform for all weavers. This variation itself would suggest that there were transactions of sale of yarn followed by transaction of sale of fabrics, though the yarn price was being paid out of payments received subsequently on the sale of the fabrics. 6.  Shri Vineet Kumar relies upon the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Shree Agency -1977 E.L.T. (J 168) = [Cencus 1976 Page 94-D] in seeking to uphold the conclusions of the lower authorities. But it should be noted that the decision of the Supreme Court was, in the said case, to uphold the finding of the Assistant Collector....