1985 (8) TMI 238

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : I.J. Rao, Member (T)]. - The brief facts pertaining to this appeal, which was originally filed as revision application before the Government of India and on transfer is now being dealt with as an appeal, are as follows :- 2.  The appellants imported, among other things, frequency transducers from Russia in 1977. These were assessed under 90.28(1....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssment under 90.24(1) of CTA, 1975. The Appellate Collector rejected the appeal holding that the transducer was a mechnical amplifier and was correctly classified under 90.28(1). It is against this order that the revision application now being treated as appeal was filed. 3.  In the revision application the appellants claim assessment under 90.29 or 90.24(1). They reiterated that the ferro....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....trical source of energy into other source of energy which can be either mechanical type of energy or sound. This being basically an electrical instrument operating on electrical principles the classification has to be under heading 90.28, since this is a general principle instrument used in any control panel for different types of job that may be required to function. As this is basically a contro....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uments which perform the mechanical functions of different instruments which fall under heading 90.24 and the transducers being a general instrument and can be used in any control panel, it has to be considered only as falling under 90.28(1). 5.  We have considered the arguments of both sides and have perused the documents, including the catalogue, placed before us. The learned Representat....