1989 (3) TMI 209

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Chakraborthy, D.R., for the Respondent. [Order per : P.C. Jain]. - This is a case of two consignments of synthetic and woollen rags. The appellants herein have not been extended the benefit of OGL as per Appendix 6(1) of the Import Export Policy of 1985-88 on the ground that these are not completely premutilated although they are otherwise admitted to be mutilated. Exact examination reports ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ted under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with Section 3(2) of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act. A fine of Rs. 2.5 lakhs for each of the two consignments has also been imposed. No penalty has, however, been imposed on the appellants. 2. Learned Consultant, Shri K.V. Kunhikrishnan appearing for the appellants has urged that the question regarding Import Policy stands already re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mitted that the appeals should be allowed following the judgments of the Tribunal and the practice of assessment in these cases. 3. Learned JDR, Shri L.C. Chakraborthy, on the other hand, urges that the question of interpretation of the Import Policy came up for consideration before Gujarat High Court in the case of M/s. Rupani Spinning Mills Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India and Others (Spl. Civil A....