1987 (3) TMI 302

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r per : S. Venkatesan, President].  - When the matter was called, no one was present on behalf of the appellants. In their letter dated 5-2-1987 they referred to the judgment dated 29-11-1979 of the Hon'ble Madras High Court in their own cases in Writ Petition Nos. 2631, 2632 and 3464 of 1977. They added that the Department had gone in appeal to the Division Bench of the High Court and the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r plea was rejected by the Assistant Collector as well as by the Appellate Collector. 4. Shri Gopinath, appearing for the Department, fairly agreed that the goods which were the subject matter of the writ petitions before the Madras High Court were also thread roll dies for their thread rolling machine. However those cases related to assessments made in terms of the First Schedule to the Indian....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the main clause of Item 72(3) as "component parts of machinery.............namely.................such parts only as are essential for the working of the machine or apparatus and have been given for that purpose some special shape or quality which would not be essential for their use for any other purpose.............." This was in preference to Item 71(a) covering "tools and parts thereof". Headi....