Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1988 (8) TMI 201

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Respondents. [Order per : I.J. Rao, Member (T)] .- None was present for the respondents but they submitted written arguments for consideration. We, therefore, heard Shri V.M. Doiphode, the learned SDR and perused the written submissions made by the respondents. 2. The facts in brief, as stated by the appellant Collector are as follows:- "M/s. Lakaki Works (P) Ltd., Lonavala, Pune (he....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ide the Order-in-Original passed by the A.C., C. Ex. Pune-I Division." 3. Shri Doiphode, the learned SDR submitted that what the appellants sold may be the same goods, namely, duty paid mineral turpentine and xylol repacked in small containers and given different names. But as they have been given a new name, packed in smaller containers and were sold as different commodities, namely, thinner, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of Maharashtra v. C.P. Manganese Ore. They also cited two more judgments, (i) [1984 (15) E.L.T. 32] - Brooke Bond India Ltd. v. Union of India and (ii) [1978 E.L.T. (J 18) Madras] E.I.D.Parry Ltd. v. Union of India in support of their arguments. 5. We have considered the arguments of both sides. The basic fact that there is no change in the product obtained by the respondents and sold by them,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and name. Such is not the case here. Therefore, the ratio of this judgment is not applicable to this appeal. 6. We have also considered the ratio of the judgment cited by the respondents. In the Brooke Bond India Ltd. (supra) the High Court observed that the essence of the expression "manufacture" "is the chaging of one object into another for the purpose of making it marketable". On this prin....