Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1987 (7) TMI 268

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Respondent. [Order Per : Syiem, Member (T)]. - Both counsels were heard. 2.  The Collector of Central Excise, Allahabad, says in his order C. No. VI(68)271/83/X-1/130H, dated 1-10 (no year) that Notification 5/81-C.E., dated 21-1-1981 cannot have retrospective effect to empower him to relax absence of declaration required in Para 1 under Notification 201/79C.E., for periods before 2....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....resent. It is bootless to hold a power like this and to say that it can be used only for future lapses. Does that mean the Notification 5/81-C.E. could have no application in the first few days after it was inaugurated? That would be an absurdity 1 am not ready to admit. 5.  To repeat, no retrospectivity is present in exercising the power of relaxation conferred by Notification 5/81-C.E., wh....