Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1987 (2) TMI 296

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i A.K. Mitra, J. REPRESENTED BY : Shri Willingdon Christian, Advocate, for the Appellants. [Order.].  - This is an appeal filed by M/s. Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers Co. Ltd., Bharuch against the Order-in-Original No. D/48/85 [F. No. V.11A(4) 71/MP/83], dated 7-11--1985 passed by the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Dn. v. Baroda confirming the demands amounting to Rs. 1,0....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ad confirmed the demands relating to quantity of LSHS used in generating the steam. The appellants contended that the Assistant Collector has erred in holding that the steam is quite a different product and is not a raw material or inputs used in the manufacture of fertilizers. The appellants therefore contended that the Assistant Collector has erred in holding that they were not entitled to benef....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tian, Advocate on behalf of the appellant-company appeared before me for the personal hearing and reiterated the arguments made in the appeal memo. 3.  I have gone through the background of the case, order-in-original appeal petition, and arguments made during the personal hearing. I find some force in the appellant's arguments. It is an admitted fact that the appellants had not sold the s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rities in their decisions as mentioned below : 1) Central Board of Excise & Customs in the case of Fertilizer Corporation of India [1982 (10) E.L.T. 421]. 2) Tribunal's order in the case of Collector of Central Excise, Bhubaneswar v. Titaghur Paper Mills [1985 (21) E.L.T. 901] and 3) Indian Oil Corporation, Barauni v. Collector of Central Excise, Patna which is squarely applicable to the ....