Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1986 (10) TMI 231

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri K.R. Shanmugha Sundaram, Consultant, for the Respondents. [Order per : V.T. Raghavachari, Member (J)]. - M/s Ramesh Enterprises (P) Ltd. presented a shipping bill on 16-6-1981 for export of 417 bags of coffee to U.S.A. by vessel "President Eisenhower". It was assessed to duty and cess at the rates prevalent on that date. On 19-6-1981 the name of the vessel in the shipping bill was amen....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s wrong, is that the provisions of Section 16(1) of the Customs Act would apply only in cases of shipping bills where no amendments are carried out and that they would not apply where the name of the vessel is amended subsequently. In this case the shipping bill was presented on 16-6-1981 mentioning the name of the vessel M.V. President Eisenhower but the name of the vessel was later amended to M.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f Section 16 would apply only with reference to the shipping bill as it was originally presented but not when an amendment in granted in the shipping bill with reference to the name of the vessel. We are unable to appreciate this argument. If an amendment of the nature mentioned above is applied for, it is open to the authorities either to grant the amendment or direct that the original shipping b....