Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1986 (10) TMI 156

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....va Prafulla on 25-2-1986 and started rummaging the ship. Search of the vessel resulted in the recovery of 32 Nos. video cassette recorders, one sanyo gas table and 37 Nos. video cassette tapes from the masthouse between hatch No. 2 and 3. The total value of the goods seized was found to be Rs. 4,39,860/-. The goods were seized by the authorities as per law on the reasonable belief that they were foreign origin and they were smuggled into the country. No one also made any claim for the goods. The Master of the vessel Capt. Naushad Azad appellant herein gave a statement before the authorities on 26-2-1986 to the effect that the Chief Officer of the vessel appellant D.R. Sharma was in-charge of the masthouse and that all the keys as well as du....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... statement of appellant Sharma admitting that he was having the keys for the masthouse wherefrom the goods under seizure were recovered. Regarding the Master of the ship the learned SDR urged that having regard to the fact that huge seizure of contraband goods had been effected on 6-2-1986 from the same ship belonging to the Shipping Corporation of India at Bombay, the Master should have been more vigilant and cannot deny any knowledge about the presence of the contraband goods concerned in this case. 4.  We have carefully considered the submissions of the parties herein. We find that the Master of the ship himself has given a statement that the masthouse wherefrom the goods under seizure have been recovered was under the charge of ....