TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
1986 (6) TMI 171
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....cial Investigation Branch of the Customs Department inspected the licensed private bonded warehouse of M/s. Maschmejer Aromatics India Limited, GST Road, Madras and found a considerable quantity by way of shortfall in the warehoused goods in the bonded store room. One Thiruvengadam was found to be in the possession of key of Customs lock of one warehouse and he gave a statement before the authorities that the imported raw materials were bonded in the private bonded warehouse, licensed by the Customs Department and whenever materials were required, the materials would be taken delivery from the warehouse and the keys of the warehouse were with one Sheriff, the Secretary of the Company. The appellant was the Managing Director of the Company t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....mpany, it was urged that either as a Managing Director or as a Chief Executive, it will be virtually impossible for a person like the appellant to be personally supervising each and every activity in the company and the liability being penal in nature, it is for the Department to establish by acceptable legal evidence that the appellant was guilty of commission or omission of guilty of abetment in the removal of goods from the customs bonded warehouse in contravention of law. The learned counsel also assailed the finding against the appellant under the impugned order contending that Shri Sheriff, the Secretary of the Company has been exonerated of a similar charge under the impugned order on similar evidence on the ground that he was implic....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....hould be held responsible for removal of goods from the bonded warehouse in contravention of law. The learned SDR further urged that even though Rahimatullah has retracted his statement, reliance could be placed on the same but fairly conceded that there is not enough of corroboration for the same. The learned SDR also did not dispute seriously the plea of the appellant that different standards has been adopted so far as the appellant is concerned and though Shri Sheriff, the Secretary of the Company has been exonerated on the ground that his implication by Thiruvengadam has not been corroborated by any other evidence, the appellant has been visited with the penalty presumably because he was the Managing Director originally and later Chief ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the Company. The records revealed that the Board of Directors of the Company knew about the removal of non-duty paid raw materials from the bonded warehouse and the raw material so removed were eventually used only for the manufacture of Company's products. If the Board of Directors, who actually control the Company knew about the clandestine removal and derive the advantage therefrom and no penal action has been taken against them on the ground that they were not privy to the illegal act of clandestine removal of raw materials, the appellant herein who was the Managing Director till 16.9.1984 and Chief Executive, thereafter cannot be singled out for penal proceedings particularly when there is no evidence at all even remotely connecting th....