Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1986 (4) TMI 226

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ipathi, SDR for the Respondents. [Order per : K.L. Rekhi, Member (T)].  - The appellants cleared compressed oxygen gas. The gas was packed in cylinders belonging to the customers. The lower authorities have held that cost of the cylinder is includible in the assessable value of gas for the purposes of assessment of central excise duty and have confirmed the demand for differential centr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....84 (Appeal No. E.329/81-A) - Collector of Central Excise, Guntur v. M/s. Hindustan Polymers Ltd., Vishakhapatnam. He reiterated the Department's two main arguments, namely, that Section 4(4)(d) allowed for deduction of durable and returnable containers belonging to the manufacturer (and not to the customer) and that exemption Notification No. 313/77-C.E., dated 8-11-1977 did not cover gas cylinder....