Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1998 (5) TMI 57

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hri Ashok Sagar, Advocate, for the Respondents. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J)]. - The issue for determination in this batch of Cases is as to whether the Assistant Commissioner has jurisdiction to adjudicate cases involving duty amounts exceeding Rs. 50,000/-. The lower authority by whose order the Revenue is aggrieved, has held that the Asstt. Commissioner has no jurisdiction ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t is an administrative irregularity. The Tribunal has set aside the Order of the Commissioner (Appeals) and remanded the matters for decisions on merits (Order No. A/188-213/98-NB and A/213-F/98-NB, dated 19-3-1998). This order of the Tribunal has been subsequently followed in a number of cases. 3. The ld. Counsel, Shri Ashok Sagar, draws our attention to the Tribunal's decision [1998 (99)....