1985 (6) TMI 113

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri K.C. Sachar, JSR, for the Respondent. [Order per : K.L. Rekhi, Member (T)] . - The appellants have, by their letter dated 15-2-1985, informed that they do not propose to present their case in person. They have requested that the matter may be decided on merits on the basis of their written submissions. 2. We have accordingly taken up the matter, heard the Department's Represent....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ellants. Thereupon, the appellants filed a revision application before the Central Government (since transferred to this Tribunal and taken up as this appeal). Simultaneously, the appellants applied for consequential refund of Rs.5,184/- on 12-12-1980 to get the relief ordered by the Appellate Collector. The Assistant Collector kept quiet for about one and a half years. After Section 51 of the Fin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ct was to put the charge of duty on deemed removals for captive consumption, whether by continuous process or otherwise, beyond the pale of doubt. The appellants had never contested the charge as such. The dispute between them and the Department was only on the question whether the charge should be on the sized weight of the yarn or on its unsized weight. Though the question was decided against th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....3 E.L.T. 326 (Gujarat) - Arvind Mills Limited v. U.O.I. & Others. In the Delhi High Court judgment cited at (2) above, the question was considered in the context of the amended Rules 9 and 49 and Section 51 of the Finance Act, 1982. The High Court, in paragraph 30 of their judgment, held that sizing was a preparatory process in the course of weaving of fabrics. All the three High Courts held th....