1984 (5) TMI 144

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h March, 1984. The circumstances are explained to be that the appeal papers were sent by registered post to the Tribunal, Pune, but was returned by the postal authorities with their remarks that the addressee was not known. It appears that the address given on the envelope was not accurate. After the appeal papers were thus received back unserved, the assessee immediately filed them again stating ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ired to be filed. The hearing of the writ petition was fixed before the Bombay High Court no different dates in the month of August and was finally rejected on 3rd Sept., 1981 agaisnt which Special Leave was filed before the Supreme Court in connection with which the assessee's authorised representative had to travel to Delhi. As soon as the authorised representative returned, the appeal was filed....