Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1979 (4) TMI 94

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ough notice was served on him. We therefore proceed to dispose of this appeal after hearing the Departmental Representative. 2. In this departmental appeal, the only point that is agitated is that the AAC erred in cancelling the reassessment made under s. 147A of the IT Act, 1961 for the asst. yr. 1970-71. The accounting year relevant for the asst. yr. 1970-71 ended on 31st March, 1970. The ori....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n this regard: (103 ITR 270) and (85 ITR 335). The AAC further referred to Supreme Court ruling in 100 ITR 1. He observed that the information regarding the remodelling of the house during the periods relevant for the asst. yrs. 1969-70 and 1970-71 as well as the amounts expended on such remodelling was within the knowledge of the ITO from the seized materials as early as 13th Aug., 1971 when the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or other evidence from which the ITO could have discovered material evidence with due diligence would not necessarily amount to disclosure within the meaning of the section. He also referred to the ruling of the Madras High Court in the case of K.P. Arthanariswamy Chettiar & Others vs. First ITO, Circle I, Salem (1). He pointed out that the disclosure should not only be full but also be true. 5....