Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1980 (2) TMI 139

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....osed by the ITO under s. 271(1)(a) of the IT Act, 1961 for the asst. yr. 1976-77. 2. Sri V.V. Nagarajan, an advocate, filed his return of income for the year under appeal on 16th March, 1977 while the same was due to be filed before 31st July, 1976. The assessment was made on 29th March, 1977. The ITO initiated penalty proceedings. A show-cause notice was served on Sri V.V. Nagarajan on 18th Ap....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....confirmed the penalty. The assessee has come on appeal before me against the order of the AAC. 3. I heard the parties. It is common ground that Sri V.V. Nagarajan to whom notice was issued to show-cause why penalty could not be imposed died before offering his explanation. His widow could not possibly explain the reasons for the delay of Sri Nagarajan in filing the return in time. However, she ....