1980 (3) TMI 138

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e assessments taking the status of the appellant as 'individual'. The appellant's main source of income was the share income from M/s. Ambica Estate. Rebate was granted on the Life Insurance Premium paid in respect of policy in the name of the appellant's wife as a member of the family. Subsequently the Agrl. ITO on the basis of the objection raised by the Audit Party, came to the conclusion that the deduction originally allowed was not permissible as per s. 10(2)(b) of the Act. He accordingly re-assessed the assessments under the s. 35 after denying the deduction originally allowed. The deduction originally allowed and subsequently withdrawn in the re-assessment was on the following amounts; Asst. yrs. Amount allowed as exempt in the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....der this Act has been levied on the agricultural income; (b) any sum paid by such person to effect an insurance on the life of such person or on the life of a wife or husband or dependant son of such person or in respect of a contract for a dependant son of such person, as the case may be, provided that the aggregate of any sums exempted under this clause shall not exceed one sixth of the total agricultural income of the assessee or six thousand rupees, whichever is less: Provided that nothing contained in this clause shall be deemed to entitle a person who is assessed to income-tax under the Indian IT Act 1922 (Central Act XI of 1922) to claim any exemption in respect of any sum referred to in this clause if it was exempted under s. ....