1976 (6) TMI 56
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... were originally completed on taxable turnovers of Rs. 32,284.70, 35, 949.58 and Rs. 33,953.00 respectively. Before the assessment for asst. yr. 1973-74 was taken up an inspection of the appellant's premises had revealed records showing suppressed purchased and sales. The assessing authority made additions by way of revision for the first three assessments and in the course of original assessment itself for the last year. For the last year, the appellant had reported a taxable turnover of Rs. 16,413.49. The assessing authority considered the purchase omissions and added 25 per cent gross profit to arrive at the sales omission. He also made separate addition for sales omission discovered and make some small additions for further possible omi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ls for revision of the assessments for the first three years under s. 16 of the At and resort to best judgment assessment under s. 12 of the Act the asst. yr. 1973-74. The claim that it is mere jottings or that the transactions mentioned therein were already accounted has been found to be clearly wrong. After going through the records, we are satisfied that there are clear omissions justifying additions revision. No doubt, separate additions have been made for purchase suppressions and sales suppressions. But they are usually of different varieties of goods. Besides, all that we are concerned is the reasonableness of the addition with reference to the materials found. Considering that the appellant has consistently kept the transactions bot....
TaxTMI