Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1995 (3) TMI 174

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....equipment. The learned CIT(A), however, gave a finding that the assessee was engaged in the manufacture of pressure blasting machines and their designs were made with the help of computers. For this and such other reasons the learned CIT(A) upheld the claim of the assessee. 3. Before us also the assessee produced evidence of having taken the aid of computers in preparing the designs of the manufactured products. Besides this, inventory control is also an essential part, not only of financial accounting but also of the manufacturing activity as a whole. We are of the opinion that to relegate down the computer merely to the position of an office equipment, is too narrow an outlook as regards the wonders a computer is capable of working. Th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 6. The learned counsel for the assessee repeated his arguments before us as were made before the learned CIT(A). 7. We are inclined to agree with the learned CIT(A). Any device which has the effect of reducing the incidence of tax, is not necessarily a colourful device liable to be demolished by the ratio of the Supreme Court's decision in the McDowell & Co. Ltd. vs. CTO (1985) 47 CTR (SC) 126 case. In order to invoke the provisions of Expln. 3 to s. 43(1), it is incumbent upon the AO first to establish that the device adopted by the assessee was either contrary to any law, or against accounting principles or against accepted practices and by using such device singly or in combination with others, it has resulted in depriving the exc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or is already received by the assessee before making estimates for the first or second instalment. Such income may have been credited in the books on appropriate dates, but while making estimate, may wrongfully conceal it, or say even make a wrongful entry in the books at a date later than the dates on which the instalments are falling due. In either case, the effect is that the advance tax which the assessee was liable to pay either on first instalment or the second instalment becoming due, gets wrongfully deferred to the third instalment. These situations are only illustrative, but these and such other situations or conduct of the assessee may lead to the postponement of payment of advance tax, and the law, therefore, seeks to levy intere....