Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1982 (12) TMI 85

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....en in this appeal is that the ld. AAC was not justified in not allowing exemption u/s 5(1)(iva) of the WT Act in respect of agricultural lands owned by the firm in which the assessee was a partner. The assessee is a partner in the firm M/s Sirehmal Moolchand Thanwala, which is engaged in agricultural activities. The assets of the firm included immovable property in the shape of agricultural lands ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... view of the decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court reported as CWT vs. Narendra Ranjalker (1981) 129 ITR 203 (AP). It is a common ground between the parties that there is a conflict of opinions on the subject between the various High Courts. The golden rule is that in such situation the view favourable to the assessee should be followed. Kindly see CIT vs. Vegetable Products Ltd. (1973) 88 ITR....