1983 (8) TMI 133

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....business. The ITO noticed that on total receipts of Rs. 2,72,702, a net profit of Rs. 32,688 had been shown, which came to less than 12.5%, and expenses to the extent of Rs. 2,40,015 were not verifiable. He, therefore estimated the net profit at 15% on receipts of Rs. 2,40,015 which came to Rs. 36,000. On appeal, the AAC confirmed the estimate on the ground that the assessee himself had shown a ne....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 2,72,702. The figure of total receipts taken by the ITO at 2,40,015 is wrong. 2. The next dispute relates to the liability for payment of interest. The ITO noticed that the return had been filed on 6th Oct., 1977 in response to a notice u/s 148. He, therefore, initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(a) and also charged interest u/s 139 (8). On appeal, it was argued before the AAC that the pro....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rmined on regular assessment, as reduced by the advance-tax, if any, paid any tax deducted at source. Now, in the present case, after adjusting the advance-tax and the tax deducted at source, the assessee was found entitled to a refund of Rs. 4,650. Therefore, apparently, no interest was payable u/s 139(8), because the interest is to be paid on the balance amount of assessed tax, after deducting t....