Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1979 (7) TMI 124

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....essee allowing him registration for the two assessment years in question. The sole ground urged in these appeals is that the declaration in Form No. 12 should have been filed by the assessee on the 30th June, 1973 and 30th June, 1974 respectively whereas both of them were actually filed on 12th Jan., 1976 and were, therefore, delayed by more than 30 and 18 months respectively. The ITO had held tha....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s assessed as URF and the question of status can certainly be taken up in the appeal against the order passed under s. 143(3) of the IT Act. The Allahabad High Court itself has recently considered the matter in ITO vs. Vinod Krishna Som Prakash(2), wherein the AAC has similarly entertained an appeal and set aside the ITO's order of refusal and upon a reference, their Lordships held that the AAC ha....