Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1994 (5) TMI 54

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h, 1989, 25th March, 1989 and 28th March, 1989 and the consideration in regard to the invoices was also duly paid to the DCM. Even before the trucks could be delivered to the assessee, the assessee had entered into a lease deed dt.16th March, 1989making it effective from1st March, 1989with the manufacturer of the trucks, namely, DCM Toyota Ltd. The total value of the trucks as paid to DCM Toyota Ltd. was Rs. 36,26,850. The lease was initially for a period of 21 months which was subsequently increased in the subsequent years. The objection of the authorities was that the trucks though were available with the manufacturer, though there was evidence indicating delivery of the same to the assessee, by means of payment of various charges and tem....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....essee had shown the assets have been used for the purposes of its business. The Departmental Representative placed heavy reliance on the orders and submitted that it was a camouflage device especially with regard to trucks being supplied or leased out to the manufacturer itself. 2. We have given our due consideration to the various materials that have been placed on our record. The undisputed facts in the instant case are that the trucks have been registered in the name of the assessee before the end of the accounting period. The lease agreement with M/s DCM Toyota Ltd. dt.16th March, 1989, clearly shows they had clearly agreed to place some security deposit and take the various trucks on hire and on that basis had taken delivery of the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d giving delivery of the cylinders to the lessee. Shri Aggarwal submitted that the Assessing Officer summoned the director of NAPL and recorded a statement on9th Oct., 1990. In this statement, the managing director corroborated the statement of the assessee that it had sold 3,000 cylinders to the assessee-company and that, it had taken them on lease as well. He also corroborated that the giving delivery of and taking delivery was simultaneously done. He also corroborated that it had 2,162 cylinders in stock and the rest were with certain parties. He submitted that the arrangement of purchase and then taking the same on lease was beneficial to that company because in the process, the assessee made available to it, finance of Rs. 5 lakhs, i.e....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Peacock Chemicals and from which place? A. The delivery challans are atFaridabadfactory and I will produce the same tomorrow in this office. However, so far as I remember the delivery was effected around the same time at our factory inFaridabad. In fact on the same day we took all these cylinders back on lease as per agreement dt.25th March, 1989@ Rs. 2 per cylinder. Both the sale of cylinders and taking back on lease were "as is where is", i.e., some of the cylinders were in the factory atFaridabadwhile others were with certain parties, the complete address of which will be given by me. The lease was initially for a period of 13 months but it is continuing till today as we are paying lease rent to Peacock Chemicals. Q. From where you....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ese cylinders has also been claimed by you? A. We are assessed with Assessing Officer 3(2),New Delhiand almost the entire sale proceeds of Rs. 51 lakhs have been shown as income in the return for the asst. yr. 1989-90. Q. What you have gained in this transaction, i.e., by selling 3,000 cylinders for Rs. 51 lakhs and then showing it as your income, then paying lease rent of Rs. 2 per cylinder and by Rs. 46 lacs in the form of security? A. I have got Rs. 5 lacs and cash flow which was much needed in view of tight financial position of the company. Q. Have you raised any loan from Goyal Gases or Peacock Chemicals? A. No loans have been raised from any of them. The above statement has been given of my free will and without any....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... had received the lease charges, its usage for business and ownership having been established, it is entitled to depreciation. We direct the Assessing Officer to allow the depreciation on the photo-composing and typesetting machine. 6. The next issue relates to disallowance of user charges of trucks paid to Goyal Gases Pvt. Ltd. The issue in this regard is identical to the one raised by the assessee for asst. yr. 1988-89, which appeal was heard along with the present appeal. The reasonings as advanced by the assessee are recorded in the order of that assessment year and similar arguments as advanced by the Department are also recorded in that assessment year's appeal orders. Detailed reasonings have been given for coming to the conclusio....