Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1991 (9) TMI 121

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....basis instead of accrual basis as in the earlier years." (2) "Without prejudice to the ground of appeal No.1 above, the learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 3,77,695 in respect of operating fee and Rs. 3,24,255 in respect of interest alleged to have been computed on accrual basis." 2. The assessee has been engaged in providing operational services and consultancy in management and running of hotels. For the purpose of accounts the year ends on 30th June. The books of accounts in this year are maintained on hybrid system as against mercantile system in earlier two assessment years, namely, asst. yr. 1981-82 and 1982-83. In this year the assessee did not account for the income by way of operating fees and interest on a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....served that the possibility of recovery was not denied. He further emphasised the fact that in the report of the Directors to the shareholders, it was intimated that the Directors expected revenue from hotel Hans to rise substantially with optimum utilisation of capacity. Hence, the Commissioner(A) concluded that the change was not bona fide. The assessee had once opted for a mercantile system of accounting and it was not open for the assessee to change the system of accounting according to its own convenience. Besides the report of the Directors did not give any indication of there being any difficulty in the recovery of the amounts due from two hotels. No other evidence to support this statement of the appellant regarding difficulty in re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... proceedings were pending in High Court of Jammu & Kashmir. It was highlighted that the amount of operating fees was not determined and the same was to be determined only after discussions and consultations by the representatives of both the sides, besides clarifying the position that no amount was received till today. (iv) From the statement of income from operating fee and interest prepared separately on the basis of mercantile system as also cash system for the asst. yrs. 1981-82 to 1987-88, it was contended that though the assessee had accounted for the operating fees on mercantile basis in asst. yrs. 1981-82 and 1982-83, no amount was received till asst. yr. 1985-86, when a small amount was received on settlement. Again from the det....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e of G. Padmanabha Chettiar & Sons vs. CIT (1989) 77 CTR (Mad) 107 : (1990) 182 ITR 1 (Mad) submitted that if the assessee desired to change over to cash system of income, then unless the expenses were also similarly changed, the change could not be permitted. 6. On going through the material placed before us to which our attention was drawn and considering the findings recorded by the tax authorities, we are of the opinion that the assessee's claim should be accepted. There is really no dispute with regard to the right of the assessee to change the method accounting for bona fide business considerations. The real dispute is only with regard to the narrow point on facts whether there was necessity for change on bona fide business conside....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g what system is chosen by the assessee regularly, the Assessing Officer had also to consider the position in the subsequent assessment years and then only it could be said that the particular system of accounting adopted in the first year of business was a regular method of accounting. Therefore, the Assessing Officer should have considered this aspect at the time of making assessment for asst. yr. 1981-82 as also for asst. yr. 1982-83 especially when it was by then brought to his notice by the assessee on 18th Sept., 1982 that the assessee had effected bona fide change in the method of accounting. What flows from this is, can it be said that the system of accounting adopted in the first two assessment years was the method regularly follow....