1997 (8) TMI 103

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s. 271(1)(c) for asst. yr. 1988-89. 2. None was present on behalf of the assessee. 3. The learned Departmental Representative relied upon the reasons mentioned in the penalty order as well as in the order of the CIT(A). 4. We have considered the submissions made by the learned representatives of the parties and have perused the orders of the learned Departmental authorities. 5. The AO ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... not justify the levy of penalty. 6. On a careful consideration of the entire relevant facts, we are of the view that the disputed additions referred to above cannot be treated as concealment of income by the assessee. The assessee has discharged the burden of proving that the amount of cash credits added in their hand does not represent real income of the assessee by producing the affidavits o....