Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1980 (12) TMI 89

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n in this appeal is that the AAC, IT Rohtak was not justified in upholding the disallowance of the bad debt of Rs. 18,937 for the asst. yr. 1978-79. The assessee is an HUF carrying on business under the name and style of M/s Khubi Ram Dwarka Dass, Charkhi Dadri, Bhiwani. According to the account of M/s Goyal Dal Mill, Bhiwani in the books of the assessee, goods worth Rs. 55,937.17 were sold by the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... invited our attention to the various letters written by the assessee to M/s Goyal Dal Mill, Rohtak demanding the amount of Rs. 18,937.17 due from it. Those letters were dt. 14thMarch, 1978 and were placed before the ITO as well as the AAC. The assessee also stated that its representative personally went to the party concerned and demanded the amount due but nothing was paid. Thereafter, the asses....