Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1990 (2) TMI 107

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion of Rs. 5,000, the taxable gift was determined at Rs. 3,36,000. 3. The assessee (donor) had preferred an appeal raising two important points. One was in regard to valuation.That was not pressed by the learned representative before the Commissioner (Appeals). The finding in this regard has, in these circumstances, become final. The second point was in regard to deduction of gift-tax liability. It is the claim of the assessee that the gift-tax liability is an allowable deduction. On this issue, the first appellate authority held as hereunder : " ... I hold that thin GTO was not correct in his view on the allowance of the tax payable as a liability in determining the value of gifted property. He is directed to do so and revise the ord....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d Wealth-tax (1989 edition, pp. 3.125-26). 5. We may set out certain facts which are not in the region of controversy. The date of gift is 10-4-1982 when the ornaments (movables) were actually handed over to the donee. At the same time, the donor had addressed a letter to the donee stating that the gift was subject to the condition that the donee would undertake to pay the gift-tax as the donor had no money with her. The donee appended a note to that letter signifying her willingness to undertake the gift-tax liability. The question is whether the deduction claimed can be allowed in view of the above. 6. It is a familiar principle that where a property subject to charge or encumbrance is gifted, the property should be valued as if it ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d by donor. That was a condition attached to the gift which the donees had accepted. Since the donees were discharging the liability which the donor was having earlier to the gift. Their Lordships of the Madras High Court held that the value of the liability was deductible from the value of the gifted property. 10. It may be seen from the above that what is deductible is a liability or encumbrance that existed prior to the gift. Whether it is a liability or charge on the property or a liability personal to the donor, in either case it is anterior to the gift. It is only such encumbrance or liability that is liable to be deducted in determining the value of the gift. 11. Irrespective of the contract between the donor and the donee, the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....le by her under the Gift-tax Act and these conditions had been accepted by the donee. Their Lordships of the Karnataka High Court held : " ... On the language of the provision as also on legal principles, it is impossible to hold that the gift-tax undertaken to be paid by the donee can be treated as consideration. It cannot be allowed as a deduction." 14. The Madras High Court has in the case of CGT v. Muthukumaraswamy Mudaliar [1986] 159 ITR 694 dealt with the same point This was also a case where a gift had been made with a condition that donee should meet the gift-tax liability and the question was whether the gift-tax payable is relevant for the purpose of determining the value of the properties that had been gifted. Their Lordshi....