Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 News - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Category: ?
Categorized by AI
---- All Categories ----
  • ---- All Categories ----
  • Income Tax
  • GST
  • Customs, DGFT & SEZ
  • FEMA & RBI
  • Corp. Laws, SEBI & IBC
  • PMLA, Black Money & ED
  • Budget
  • News and Press Release
  • PTI News
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    The Latest: Trump addresses press after Supreme Court strikes down his sweeping tariffs
    No change in trade deal with India; it is on: Trump after SC verdict
    Trump says he used tariffs to end war between India, Pakistan as he lashes out at US Supreme Court verdict
    Trump says he'll sign executive order to enact 10 per cent global tariff after US Supreme Court defeat,
    Trump says he's 'absolutely ashamed' of US Supreme Court justices who issued 'deeply disappointing'  tariff decision
    Congress slams govt for agreeing to trade deal after US Supreme Court strikes down Trump's tariffs
    Refunds may be available on some tariffs applied to goods from India: US Chamber of Commerce after SC ruling
    What to know about the Supreme Court ruling on tariffs
    Trump's made tariffs central to his presidency, chaos may come next
    The Supreme Court struck down some of Trump's most sweeping tariffs; Which levies are impacted?
    'Walking away' from recent deals does not seem to be in cards for America's partners: Ex-trade official
    Exporters hail US Supreme Court's decision on Trump tariff
    Trump has other tariff options after Supreme Court strikes down his worldwide import taxes
    SC ruling on Trump's tariffs: Judge refers to tariffs imposed on India for buying Russian oil in dissenting note
    EU, US trade deals to boost Indian economy; growth resilient: RBI bulletin
    Supreme Court strikes down Trump's sweeping tariffs, upending central plank of economic agenda
    India’s macroeconomic fundamentals healthy, robust amid volatile financial markets: RBI guv
    Former Jaypee Infratech MD Manoj Gaur surrenders in Delhi's Tihar Jail
    Current policy rate appropriate amid buoyant eco growth, benign inflation: RBI Guv
    FTAs to play significant role in coming years by improving market access: RBI bulletin
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

News
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Executive emergency tariff authority limited, prompting administration to pursue alternative statutory bases for imposing tariffs.
The Supreme Court concluded that the Constitution vests the taxing power in Congress and that the emergency statute invoked by the Executive does not authorize imposition of tariffs as revenue measures, constraining executive emergency tariff authority; the administration plans to rely on alternative statutory bases to replace the invalidated tariffs.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Tariff policy remains central as the India trade arrangement continues despite judicial limits on tariff authority.
President Trump stated the bilateral trade arrangement with India remains in effect after the Supreme Court invalidated his broad tariffs, noting an Executive Order rescinded punitive tariffs on Indian oil imports from Russia and an Interim Agreement framework reduces reciprocal U.S. tariff treatment toward India while maintaining tariffs on Indian imports under the new terms; he framed tariffs as leverage for energy-sourcing commitments and de-escalation between India and Pakistan.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
IEEPA authority rejected, limiting tariff powers while administration decries the decision and cites geopolitical effects.
The Supreme Court held that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not authorize imposition of duties, constraining executive authority to impose tariffs under national emergencies; the President criticized the ruling and reiterated that tariffs were used as a foreign policy tool to end hostilities between India and Pakistan, a claim denied by India which attributes cessation to direct military talks.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Global tariff authority challenged after court invalidated emergency-use tariffs; president plans executive-order, time-limited alternative.
A judicial body invalidated a broad presidential program of global tariffs as an unlawful exercise of emergency power, eliminating the administration's primary emergency-based mechanism for imposing unilateral worldwide duties. The president announced intent to use an alternative statutory authority via executive order that would impose time-limited tariffs restricted to 150 days, signaling a shift to a different administrative vehicle for trade measures.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Emergency powers invalidation limits executive authority to impose unilateral tariffs, nullifying sweeping reciprocal import duties.
The executive's imposition of sweeping "reciprocal" import duties under a claimed emergency powers statute was found unlawful; the tariffs were invalidated because setting import duties required clear congressional authorization rather than unilateral emergency proclamations, signaling a legal limit on executive authority to alter statutory tariff schemes by emergency declaration.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Judicial review of emergency tariff powers restores congressional tariff authority, affecting recently announced India-US trade concessions.
The US Supreme Court struck down President Trump's global tariffs imposed under emergency powers, finding tariff authority lies with Congress, thereby removing the legal basis for those sweeping reciprocal tariffs. Indian opposition leaders contend that a recently announced India-US trade framework contained concessions extracted while the tariffs were assumed valid, and they seek clarity on whether those commitments-covering tariff eliminations, import targets, energy sourcing, and non tariff barrier commitments-will persist or be revisited following the judgment.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
IEEPA authority invalidated - certain IEEPA based tariffs now refundable to importers who directly paid them.
IEEPA based tariffs were deemed impermissible, allowing refunds only to US importers of record or consignees who directly paid tariffs. Eligible tariffs include IEEPA imposed levies commonly termed fentanyl, trafficking, reciprocal or baseline tariffs, including certain tariffs on goods from Brazil and India. Refunds exclude duties imposed under other statutory authorities such as anti dumping, countervailing, trade remedy or national security provisions. The administrative procedure and timing for claims remain uncertain pending further court and executive guidance.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
Presidential emergency powers limited: IEEPA cannot be used to impose broad import tariffs, leaving refund questions open.
The Supreme Court concluded that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not authorize the president to impose broad import tariffs, stressing that authority to levy taxes and tariffs rests with Congress and that longstanding practice shows such power has not been exercised under IEEPA. The opinion invalidates tariffs enacted under emergency proclamations while leaving untouched tariffs based on other statutory grounds, and it leaves unresolved whether and how refunds should be returned to importers who paid the challenged levies.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
Presidential emergency tariff power invalidated, forcing alternative legal routes and prolonging trade and political uncertainty.
The Court held the president lacked authority to declare an economic emergency and impose sweeping import tariffs, removing an executive legal basis for those tariffs and forcing the administration to pursue alternative statutory mechanisms, which will prolong legal and political debate over trade policy.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
IEEPA authority curtailed: major emergency based tariffs invalidated, leaving sectoral trade measures and exemptions intact.
The President exceeded statutory authority by invoking IEEPA to impose broad import tariffs, nullifying core emergency based levies. Affected measures include the wide ranging "Liberation Day" tariffs, trafficking justified duties on Canada, Mexico and China, Brazil linked duties, and India related levies tied to Russian oil purchases. The decision removes the IEEPA route for economy wide tariffs but leaves intact sectoral and statute specific tools that continue to impose tariffs on selected industries and products.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
IEEPA authority struck down; partners unlikely to abandon recent tariff deals, administration to rely on other statutes.
The Supreme Court invalidated reliance on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose broad tariffs, finding IEEPA does not authorize such duties. Observers anticipate the Administration will instead invoke clear congressional tariff statutes and that trading partners who made recent deals are unlikely to withdraw them, having expected alternative statutory mechanisms to keep tariffs in place.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
Emergency-powers tariff invalidation restores trade predictability for exporters, but sectoral steel and aluminium duties remain in force.
The US Supreme Court invalidated country-specific reciprocal tariffs imposed under emergency powers, restoring predictability for exporters and enabling importers to seek refunds for duties paid under the invalidated regime, while separate sector-specific duties on steel, aluminium and certain auto components remain in force.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
Tariff authority options: multiple statutory pathways remain for imposing import duties despite limits on emergency powers.
After the court rejected the administration's emergency-based authority for sweeping reciprocal tariffs, the president can still impose import duties using alternative statutes: the Trade Act unfair-practices authority permitting unlimited tariffs after investigation and hearings; the Trade Act provision for addressing unbalanced trade that allows time-limited tariffs without prior investigation but is untested; the national-security tariff authority under the Trade Expansion Act which requires Commerce investigations; and a rarely used Tariff Act depression-era authorisation that allows very high, indefinite tariffs without investigation.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
IEEPA authority questioned as tariffs ruled unauthorized; dissent stresses tariffs' foreign affairs leverage, including India example.
The decision holds that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not authorize the imposition of import duties, rejecting the use of IEEPA as a statutory basis for tariffs; a dissent argued such tariffs fall within foreign affairs practice, serve as leverage in international negotiations, and cautioned against applying a major questions constraint to executive statutory authority in national security and diplomatic contexts.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
Trade deals improve market access and spur investor confidence, supporting growth and fiscal consolidation momentum.
Trade agreements with the EU and an interim US deal are expected to improve market access, boost export competitiveness, and reverse investor sentiment with renewed foreign portfolio investment into equity and debt. Fiscal consolidation alongside stepped up capital expenditure aims to crowd in private investment and support state infrastructure. Concurrently, the Reserve Bank recorded consecutive spot market dollar sales amid rupee volatility and capital flow intermittency, while inflation is expected to remain near target, sustaining a favourable near term growth-inflation balance.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
Emergency powers limits curb broad presidential tariffs, invalidating sweeping reciprocal trade measures and reshaping trade policy authority.
The Supreme Court found that tariffs enacted under asserted emergency statutory powers-including widely applied reciprocal tariffs-exceeded the President's lawful authority, clarifying statutory limits on unilateral tariff measures and signaling judicial constraints on executive use of emergency powers for sweeping trade regulation.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
Repo rate decision maintains neutral monetary stance as growth outlook brightens while inflation risks remain monitored.
The Monetary Policy Committee held the repo rate steady and retained a neutral stance, finding the current policy rate appropriate amid buoyant growth and broadly benign inflation. Members cited healthy medium term macroeconomic fundamentals and improving external outlook driven by trade agreements and fiscal measures, while noting persistent global volatility and risks to inflation. The MPC emphasized ongoing transmission of prior easing, awaited new GDP and inflation data series, and reaffirmed readiness to reassess policy as fresh data emerge.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
Money laundering allegations prompt former MD to surrender to custody after interim bail term expires in fraud-linked probe.
Allegations of money laundering and diversion of homebuyer funds form the basis of an ED investigation and FIRs alleging that two group companies misapplied project receipts, leaving residential projects incomplete and purchasers defrauded. The promoter was arrested, obtained interim bail, and later surrendered after a court denied regular bail, the court noting allegations of widespread cheating and criminal breach of trust. A related listed company filed a regulatory update confirming the director's surrender upon expiration of interim bail.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
Policy rate maintained as appropriate: neutral monetary stance justified by buoyant growth and benign inflation.
The Monetary Policy Committee voted to maintain the existing policy repo rate and retain a neutral stance, finding the current policy rate appropriate given buoyant growth and benign inflation. The Governor noted healthy medium term macroeconomic fundamentals, while the Deputy Governor cited upward revisions to near term growth projections and incomplete transmission of earlier rate cuts as reasons to defer further easing until new GDP and inflation series data are available.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
Free trade agreements improving market access and export competitiveness, prompting investor confidence and supporting growth policy.
Free trade agreements with the EU and an interim pact with the US are expected to improve market access, enhance export competitiveness, and deepen Indian firms' integration into global value chains; this expectation has altered investor sentiment, prompting a return of foreign portfolio investment, while the Union Budget stresses fiscal consolidation alongside stepped up capital expenditure, and headline inflation remains benign under the revised CPI series.

News

Back

All News

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

News

Back

All News

Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Form 37 – Frequently Asked Questions

March 26, 2026

Contents
Forms
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Form 37 – Frequently Asked Questions

Certificate for claiming deduction under section 152(5) of the Income-tax Act, 2025 by resident individual patentees in receipt of royalty on patents

Name of form as per I.T. Rules, 1962

Form 10CCE

Name of form as per I.T. Rules, 2026

37

Corresponding section of I.T. Act, 1961

80RRB

Corresponding section of I.T. Act, 2025

152(5)

Corresponding Rule of I.T. Rules, 1962

19AD

Corresponding Rule of I.T. Rules, 2026

71

1: What is Form 37 ?

Ans: Form 37 is the prescribed form for filing of certificate for claim of deduction under section 152(5) of the Income-tax Act’ 2025 (“ITA 2025”) by a patentee, being a resident individual, who is in receipt of royalty income during the relevant tax year, in respect of a patent registered on or after 01.04.2003 under the Patents Act’ 1970.

2: Who should file Form 37?

Ans: Any individual resident patentee, who is in receipt of income by way of royalty on patents during the relevant tax year, and who intends to claim deduction in respect of such royalty income under section 152(5) of the ITA 2025, should file the certificate in Form 37.

3. Who is required to verify the Form 37?

Ans. The patentee, who is in receipt of royalty income on patents, during the relevant tax year, is required to make a self-declaration in Part B of the Form 37, to the effect that the royalty income declared therein on the patents is eligible for deduction under section 152 of the ITA 2025.

Further, the Controller of Patents in whose jurisdiction the patent was registered, is also required to certify the details of the patent registered, the details of the patentee in whose name the patent was registered, and the detail of compulsory license issued by his office, if any, in respect of such registered patents; independently in Part C of the Form 37.

4: Where and how the Form 37 is required to be filed?

Ans: The Form 37 shall be filed electronically on the e-filing portal of Income-tax Department. The form shall be furnished electronically either under digital signature or through electronic verification code, duly verified by the patentee. The details of the patent registered, patentee, and compulsory license issued for such patent, if any, (as mentioned by the author in Rows 3 to 5 of Part B), are further required to be certified by the Controller of Patents.

5: What is the time limit for filing Form 37?

Ans: The certificate in Form 37 for claim of deduction under section 152(5) of the ITA’ 2025 is required to be filed electronically on or before such “due date” for filing return of income prescribed under section 263(1)(c) of the ITA’ 2025, as may apply for the individual patentee claiming the deduction. This time limit is specified in the statute itself.

6: What documents are required to file Form 37?

Ans: The following documents may be required while filing Form 37, -  Royalty Agreement

Statement of Royalty paid during the year

Bank advisories,

Foreign Inward Remittance Certificate/ bank entry, if applicable

Approval of competent authority for extension of period, if any, in case of foreign inward remittances

Compulsory license issued by the Controller of Patents in respect of the registered patent, if any

7. Is Form 37 mandatory?

Ans: Filing of a valid Form 37 within the specified time limit, is a mandatory condition for making an admissible claim of deduction under section 152(5), by the patentee, being a resident individual, who is in receipt of royalty income on patents, during the relevant tax year.

8: Can I edit Form 37 after submission?

Ans: No. Once Form 37 is validly submitted, after self-declaration by the patentee and certification by the Controller of Patents, and acknowledgment is generated, it cannot be edited. Please ensure that all details are correct before final submission.

9: Do I need to attach any document with the Form 37?

Ans: No. It is not mandatory to attach any document with the Form 37.

10: While filling Part A and Part B, can I leave any field blank?

Ans:

PAN of the Patentee is mandatory. Name and complete address thereof shall be pre-filled, which can be updated by the user.

PAN of the person paying the royalty on patent can be left blank only if it is a foreign entity having no PAN.

Details and amounts in Columns 5, 8 and 9 of Part B may be provided, as applicable.

Amount of deduction claimed in Column 10 is a mandatory field.

11: What if the patentee does not have a PAN?

Ans: Form 37 cannot be submitted without a valid PAN of the patentee.

12: Can Form 37 be filed offline?

Ans: No. Form 37 can only be submitted online through the Income Tax e-Filing portal.

13: Why is Form 37 important?

Ans: Filing of a valid certificate in Form 37 within the specified time limit is a mandatory compliance for claiming deduction in respect of royalty on patents, under section 152 of the ITA’ 2025. However, the claim of deduction is further subject to fulfillment of various other eligibility conditions, as prescribed in the statute.

14. Can I mention the amounts of foreign inward remittances in the foreign currency?

Ans. No. The amounts of royalty received in foreign currency is required to be stated in Indian rupees, in the rows (8) and (9).

Topics

Acts Income Tax