Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 News - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Category: ?
Categorized by AI
---- All Categories ----
  • ---- All Categories ----
  • Income Tax
  • GST
  • Customs, DGFT & SEZ
  • FEMA & RBI
  • Corp. Laws, SEBI & IBC
  • PMLA, Black Money & ED
  • Budget
  • News and Press Release
  • PTI News
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Congress claims US trade deal has become an 'ordeal', Rahul says 'PM compromised'
    Murky outlook for businesses after tariff ruling prompts countermoves by Trump
    Indian-origin lawyer at centre of landmark Supreme Court verdict against Trump
    Supreme Court struck down Trump's tariffs. Now comes hard work of issuing refunds
    Perfios Launches 'KScan AI': Empowers BFSI with AI-powered Business Intelligence and Risk Assessment of 30 Million Indian MSMEs
    Indian goods face only 10 pc reciprocal levy in US after court ruling, new order: Exporters
    Minutes of the Monetary Policy Committee Meeting, February 4 to 6, 2026 [Under Section 45ZL of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934]
    US trade deal has become an ordeal: Congress slams PM Modi
    Nothing changes, India will be paying tariffs; we will not be paying tariffs: Trump after SC ruling
    Trump seethes over Supreme Court justices who opposed him on tariffs, especially those he appointed
    The Latest: Trump says he'll sign executive order to enact 10 per cent global tariff
    Which Trump tariffs did Supreme Court strike down? Here's what to know
    The Latest: Trump addresses press after Supreme Court strikes down his sweeping tariffs
    No change in trade deal with India; it is on: Trump after SC verdict
    Trump says he used tariffs to end war between India, Pakistan as he lashes out at US Supreme Court verdict
    Trump says he'll sign executive order to enact 10 per cent global tariff after US Supreme Court defeat,
    Trump says he's 'absolutely ashamed' of US Supreme Court justices who issued 'deeply disappointing'  tariff decision
    Congress slams govt for agreeing to trade deal after US Supreme Court strikes down Trump's tariffs
    Refunds may be available on some tariffs applied to goods from India: US Chamber of Commerce after SC ruling
    What to know about the Supreme Court ruling on tariffs
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

News
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Presidential tariff authority reversed, trade deal's tariff basis challenged; India-US agreement's viability questioned, prompting political backlash domestically.
Following a judicial curtailment of presidential power to impose global tariffs under emergency authority, the US administration invoked an alternative statute to impose a temporary import surcharge to preserve an existing India-US interim trade framework; this shift alters the tariff basis of the deal and raises questions about the surcharge's applicability to India and the deal's implications for market access, subsidy withdrawal, agricultural protections, energy security, and data safeguards.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Presidential tariff authority limited by court; administration seeks alternative statutory paths to maintain import duties, prolonging business uncertainty.
The Supreme Court ruled the president lacked authority under the emergency-powers framework to impose import tariffs, voiding tariffs imposed on that basis while leaving open the administration's use of other statutory authorities to impose duties; the decision narrows one executive route for tariffs but creates complex refund and recovery issues and leaves many existing tariffs under different authorities intact.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Separation of powers affirmed: Presidential global tariffs invalidated, reaffirming that only Congress may impose taxes.
A Supreme Court decision concluded that broad presidential global tariffs exceeded executive authority by encroaching on Congress's exclusive power over taxation; counsel for small businesses argued the levies operated as taxes imposed without congressional authorization, framing the dispute as a structural separation of powers issue and reaffirming that only Congress can impose taxes.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Invalidation of emergency tariff authority leaves collected import duties subject to refund and protracted litigation.
The Supreme Court held the International Emergency Economic Powers Act did not authorize presidential tariffs, leaving collected import duties unlawful but not prescribing a refund mechanism. Administration of refunds will likely involve the customs agency, specialised trade tribunals and lower courts, utilising or adapting existing duty correction procedures, and is expected to produce prolonged, multi jurisdictional litigation as importers seek recovery while consumers face evidentiary obstacles to claiming pass through losses.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
KYC/KYB compliance automation expands: AI platform streamlines MSME due diligence, risk screening and faster onboarding for lenders.
An AI-powered KYC/KYB platform automates entity and individual due diligence and compliance for the BFSI sector, centralising MSME discovery and risk evaluation via a large multi-source data lake. It supports onboarding, underwriting, GTM optimisation and credit decisioning by converting fragmented business information into actionable intelligence. The system enables scaled lead generation, automated due diligence, and extensive sanction and litigation screening to bolster anti-money laundering controls, and provides a Model Context Protocol allowing configurable AI agents and custom model integration to align with institutional policies.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Temporary import surcharge lowers reciprocal US tariff on Indian goods following legal limitation on presidential tariff powers
A presidential proclamation imposes a temporary import surcharge of ten per cent ad valorem, effective February 24, 2026, applied in addition to existing Most Favoured Nation duties; this replaces prior broader reciprocal levies on Indian goods, while higher sectoral tariffs for specified products remain and the surcharge applies only to a portion of exports due to coverage exemptions.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Policy repo rate unchanged; MPC retains neutral stance as inflation stays benign while growth outlook strengthens.
Under Section 45ZL the MPC's minutes record a unanimous decision to keep the policy repo rate unchanged and to retain the neutral stance after reviewing staff projections, surveys and alternative risk scenarios. The committee judged growth prospects to have strengthened while headline inflation remains benign though modestly revised upward for near quarters due mainly to precious metals; risks to the outlook are broadly balanced and policy will be guided by incoming data and the progress of transmission.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Constitutional limits on presidential tariff power overturned global tariffs, reshaping the interim India-US trade deal consequences.
The US Supreme Court invalidated the President's global tariffs imposed under emergency powers, finding tariff authority lies with Congress; the decision undercuts executive unilateral tariff measures. The India-US interim agreement saw an Executive Order lifting prior punitive tariffs in return for India's energy purchasing commitments, and a reduced reciprocal tariff rate was agreed. Indian political opposition alleges the deal's timing reflected executive haste that risked sovereign bargaining leverage and domestic agricultural interests.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Presidential tariff authority curtailed; temporary global import duty imposed to rebalance trade while India trade framework remains intact.
The Supreme Court held that the President exceeded authority in imposing sweeping tariffs; in response the President signed a Proclamation imposing a temporary import duty to address international payments problems and rebalance trade relationships, effective on a specified date for a limited period. The President stated that an interim trade framework with India remains in place, removing certain punitive tariffs on India under an Executive Order while asserting India will assume tariff obligations under the bilateral arrangement.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Emergency powers tariffs invalidation prompts presidential denunciation of justices and raises separation of powers and institutional independence debate.
Six justices invalidated presidential global tariffs imposed under an asserted emergency powers statute, framing the central legal question as the permissible scope of executive authority to impose trade restrictions without clear congressional authorization, and the litigation tested statutory delegation, administrative action in the trade context, and judicial review of national-security framed economic measures.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Emergency power limits prompt alternative executive tariff action, raising concerns about agriculture costs and trade uncertainty.
The Supreme Court invalidated a presidential tariff framework as an unlawful exercise of emergency power, leading the president to announce use of alternative executive authority to impose a temporary global tariff. Stakeholders warned that further tariff actions or use of other authorities would increase agricultural input costs and create trade uncertainty, while business groups said ties with trade partners remain intact despite the disruption.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Presidential emergency powers curtailed as court invalidates broad tariffs imposed under IEEPA, overturning central global levies.
The Supreme Court found the President exceeded authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act by using IEEPA to impose broad tariffs, invalidating core IEEPA-based measures including the Liberation Day global tariff framework and subsequent trafficking and country-specific levies on Canada, Mexico, China, Brazil and India; sectoral and non-IEEPA tariffs remain in place while the executive considers alternative measures.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Executive emergency tariff authority limited, prompting administration to pursue alternative statutory bases for imposing tariffs.
The Supreme Court concluded that the Constitution vests the taxing power in Congress and that the emergency statute invoked by the Executive does not authorize imposition of tariffs as revenue measures, constraining executive emergency tariff authority; the administration plans to rely on alternative statutory bases to replace the invalidated tariffs.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Tariff policy remains central as the India trade arrangement continues despite judicial limits on tariff authority.
President Trump stated the bilateral trade arrangement with India remains in effect after the Supreme Court invalidated his broad tariffs, noting an Executive Order rescinded punitive tariffs on Indian oil imports from Russia and an Interim Agreement framework reduces reciprocal U.S. tariff treatment toward India while maintaining tariffs on Indian imports under the new terms; he framed tariffs as leverage for energy-sourcing commitments and de-escalation between India and Pakistan.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
IEEPA authority rejected, limiting tariff powers while administration decries the decision and cites geopolitical effects.
The Supreme Court held that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not authorize imposition of duties, constraining executive authority to impose tariffs under national emergencies; the President criticized the ruling and reiterated that tariffs were used as a foreign policy tool to end hostilities between India and Pakistan, a claim denied by India which attributes cessation to direct military talks.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Global tariff authority challenged after court invalidated emergency-use tariffs; president plans executive-order, time-limited alternative.
A judicial body invalidated a broad presidential program of global tariffs as an unlawful exercise of emergency power, eliminating the administration's primary emergency-based mechanism for imposing unilateral worldwide duties. The president announced intent to use an alternative statutory authority via executive order that would impose time-limited tariffs restricted to 150 days, signaling a shift to a different administrative vehicle for trade measures.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Emergency powers invalidation limits executive authority to impose unilateral tariffs, nullifying sweeping reciprocal import duties.
The executive's imposition of sweeping "reciprocal" import duties under a claimed emergency powers statute was found unlawful; the tariffs were invalidated because setting import duties required clear congressional authorization rather than unilateral emergency proclamations, signaling a legal limit on executive authority to alter statutory tariff schemes by emergency declaration.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Judicial review of emergency tariff powers restores congressional tariff authority, affecting recently announced India-US trade concessions.
The US Supreme Court struck down President Trump's global tariffs imposed under emergency powers, finding tariff authority lies with Congress, thereby removing the legal basis for those sweeping reciprocal tariffs. Indian opposition leaders contend that a recently announced India-US trade framework contained concessions extracted while the tariffs were assumed valid, and they seek clarity on whether those commitments-covering tariff eliminations, import targets, energy sourcing, and non tariff barrier commitments-will persist or be revisited following the judgment.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
IEEPA authority invalidated - certain IEEPA based tariffs now refundable to importers who directly paid them.
IEEPA based tariffs were deemed impermissible, allowing refunds only to US importers of record or consignees who directly paid tariffs. Eligible tariffs include IEEPA imposed levies commonly termed fentanyl, trafficking, reciprocal or baseline tariffs, including certain tariffs on goods from Brazil and India. Refunds exclude duties imposed under other statutory authorities such as anti dumping, countervailing, trade remedy or national security provisions. The administrative procedure and timing for claims remain uncertain pending further court and executive guidance.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
Presidential emergency powers limited: IEEPA cannot be used to impose broad import tariffs, leaving refund questions open.
The Supreme Court concluded that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not authorize the president to impose broad import tariffs, stressing that authority to levy taxes and tariffs rests with Congress and that longstanding practice shows such power has not been exercised under IEEPA. The opinion invalidates tariffs enacted under emergency proclamations while leaving untouched tariffs based on other statutory grounds, and it leaves unresolved whether and how refunds should be returned to importers who paid the challenged levies.

News

Back

All News

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

News

Back

All News

Showing Results for : Reset Filters
News and Press Release

Digitalisation for Inclusive Finance and Sustainability: Priorities for the Next Phase - Valedictory Address by Shri Swaminathan J, Deputy Governor, Reserve Bank of India at the CAB–NIBM International Conference on Digitalisation for Inclusive Finance and Sustainability, in Pune on March 6, 2026

March 10, 2026

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Professor Partha Ray, Director, National Institute of Bank Management (NIBM), Shri Jaikish, Principal, College of Agricultural Banking (CAB), distinguished delegates, researchers, faculty, policymakers, industry leaders, colleagues from India and overseas, ladies and gentlemen. Good afternoon.

2. As we come to the close of this International Conference on Digitalisation for Inclusive Finance and Sustainability, let me begin by congratulating CAB and NIBM for convening an important conversation at the right time. I am sure the participation over the last two days has been strong, and the discussions have been both forward-looking and grounded in practical realities.

3. As I reviewed the papers presented, one message came through clearly. Digitalisation is not a goal by itself. It is a means. The real question is: how do we use digital tools to deliver financial services that are accessible, affordable, safe, and useful, while also supporting sustainability and resilience.

4. Against this backdrop, I would like to reflect on three shifts shaping this landscape, then underline what I would call the confidence architecture needed for digital finance at scale, and finally offer a few closing priorities for the road ahead.

From access to capability and confidence

5. The first shift is in how we look at inclusion.

6. For a long time, access meant inclusion but the next phase of that is about something deeper: capability and confidence. Inclusion becomes meaningful when households and small businesses can use financial products and payment rails regularly and safely.

7. Indeed, many discussions in the papers presented here highlight the idea that barriers to inclusion are not only physical. They can also be informational and behavioural. People may have connectivity but lack confidence. They may have access but not agency. They may have a digital tool but not the ability to resolve a problem.

8. This is why design matters. Effective inclusion solutions often look simple on the surface, but they are thoughtfully engineered underneath. They use plain language. They work in low bandwidth settings. They allow assisted journeys. They respect the realities of irregular incomes and modest savings.

9. A special dimension of capability is the gender gap in digital finance. Bridging this gap is not about devices and connectivity. It requires building women’s digital and financial skills and improving safety and privacy further in digital journeys. If we want digital inclusion to endure, products and processes must be designed around these realities.

From faster finance to fair finance

10. The second shift is about digital credit and digital intermediation.

11. Digital lending and platform-based models have expanded quickly because they offer speed and convenience. That is a real benefit. But credit is not like any other routine transaction. Credit can strengthen livelihoods. But, if poorly underwritten, it can also deepen distress through over indebtedness.

12. The discussions here highlighted a central point: the next phase of digital credit must be not only fast, but fair, transparent, and affordable.

13. A related theme is the growing role of data and algorithmic rule engines in credit decisions. Data can reduce frictions and widen access, but it also brings up some important questions. Are we pricing risk, or pricing vulnerability? Are decisions explainable in plain language? Are models being monitored for bias and drift?

14. These questions shape customer confidence, market discipline, and the credibility of the digital finance ecosystem.

From sustainability as a separate agenda to sustainability as core resilience

15. The third shift is the assimilation of sustainability into mainstream finance.

16. Sustainability is sometimes treated as a specialised product line or a reporting exercise. As climate and environmental risks do translate into financial risks, especially for climate-sensitive sectors and regions, sustainability has to be integral to our products and processes.

17. At the same time, digitalisation offers tools to strengthen resilience. Better data can improve risk understanding. More responsive credit can support adaptation investments. Digital monitoring can improve transparency and reduce the cost of compliance and reporting.

18. But we should also be realistic. Sustainability outcomes require more than digital tools. They require sound institutions, robust capital and good governance. Digital transformation can enable, but it cannot substitute for the fundamentals.

Confidence architecture is the next frontier

19. If you bring these three shifts together you will see that the next frontier is not simply building more digital finance. It is building digital finance that people can rely on. This calls for an ecosystem with strong foundations, with four key elements.

20. The first is security and resilience. As participation scales up, vulnerabilities also scale up. We must invest continuously in cyber security, fraud prevention, incident response, and business continuity. Confidence is built through reliability in ordinary times, and through competence and clarity when disruptions occur.

21. The second is accountability and effective redress. When a customer is harmed in a digital journey, they should not be passed from one entity to another. Responsibility must be clear. Grievance redress should be simple, time-bound, and effective. A system earns confidence when people experience that help is real, accessible, and fair.

22. The third is data discipline and meaningful consent. Digital finance runs on data. But data must be handled with discipline: purpose limitation, minimum necessary collection, secure storage, and transparent sharing. Consent must be meaningful, not hidden in fine print.

23. The fourth is inclusion with dignity. Inclusion is not only onboarding. It is ongoing service. It is also language, appropriate accessibility and respectful treatment. It is designing for the person who is least comfortable with technology, not only for the person who is most fluent.

24. Before I turn to the closing priorities, let me briefly underline the critical contribution of digital public infrastructure and interoperability. When core rails are resilient, widely usable, and interoperable, they reduce the cost of reaching the last mile and allow providers to compete on service quality rather than on customer lock-in. They also make it easier to deliver targeted support at scale, whether through faster benefit transfers, smoother onboarding, or quicker delivery of small-value financial services.

25. However, the wider the rails, the higher the responsibility. Strong governance is essential: clear standards, reliable uptime, auditable processes, and proportionate safeguards, so that innovation can scale without weakening system stability.

Closing: Five priorities going forward

26. As someone who has watched India’s digital finance ecosystem evolve at close quarters, permit me to close with five practical priorities that can help digitalisation deliver inclusion and sustainability.

27. First, build for outcomes, not optics. We should track adoption, but our focus should remain on what matters: active use, reliability, affordability, customer wellbeing, and resilience.

28. Second, design for the last user. If the journey works for the most constrained user, it will work for everyone. Simple interfaces, low-data design, assisted options, and clear grievance pathways should be treated as core features.

29. Third, make fairness non-negotiable. Innovation is welcome, but fairness is essential. Transparent pricing, explainable decisions, respectful collections, and strong redress mechanisms, all should be built into digital credit models.

30. Fourth, treat resilience as a design requirement. Operational resilience and cybersecurity are not mere compliance items. They are integral to service quality. People experience credibility through consistency and reliability, not through policy documents.

31. Fifth, collaborate, because no one actor can solve this alone. Digital finance and sustainability sit at the intersection of regulation, technology, business incentives, and human behaviour. Progress requires collaboration across regulators, financial institutions, fintechs, researchers, and civil society. Conferences like this help build shared understanding and improve the quality of solutions.

32. In conclusion, digitalisation increases reach and speed. It also increases the vulnerabilities. The task before us therefore, is to ensure that digital finance scales what is good: inclusion that is usable, innovation that is responsible, and finance that supports resilience and sustainability.

33. On behalf of the Reserve Bank of India, I thank CAB and NIBM for hosting this conference, and I thank all participants for contributing to a meaningful and constructive dialogue. I hope the ideas discussed here translate into safer rails, better products, and more sustainable outcomes for our citizens and our economy.

34. Thank you. Jai Hind.

Topics

Acts Income Tax